Title
Author
Keywords
JOURNAL OF DIALECTICS OF NATURE
A Comprehensive, Academic Journal of the Philosophy, History, Sociology and Cultural Studies of Science and Technology
English
Chinese
Home
Browse
Published ahead of Print
Latest Issue
More Content
Purchase
Submit
Sign up/in
Author Guidelines
About Us
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Conference
Home
Browse
Published ahead of Print
Latest Issue
More Content
Purchase
Submit
Sign up/in
Author Guidelines
About Us
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Conference
Author Information
SHUANG Xiuhai
Information
<p>School of Marxism</p><p>Dongguan University of Technology</p><p>shuangxiuhai@126.com</p>
Research Articles
Evolutionary Biology and Teleology: On the Philosophical Basis about the Thought of “Evolution”
Abstract: The relationship between biology and teleology has always been a controversial topic. Darwin considers natural selection as an important cause of evolution. This thought not only excludes theological teleology, but also makes evolutionary lose the philosophical foundation. Although Mayr considers evolutionary biology as the research about ultimate causes which has a close relation with teleology, but Mayr's teleology was biological or mundane, so it cannot provide a deep basis for evolution. Instead, Kant's teleology was transcendental, so it can provides a philosophical basis for evolution. Kant's teleology has its special status and value in evolutionary biology; it therefore shouldn't be overlooked or marginalized.
Author:
SHUANG Xiuhai
CHEN Xiaoping
Issue:Volume 40, lssue 5, May 2018
Page: 25-32
Truthmaker Theory, Correspondence Theory and Identity theory of Truth
Abstract: Armstrong, the main advocator of truthmaker theory, chose “state of affairs” as the ontological ground for truth, to adhere to factualism rather than thingism, and to adhere to correspondence theory of truth rather than identity theory of truth. However, the dispute between factualism and thingism is entangled without specific contexts, and the difference between the two after combining contexts is not important. What is important is the dispute between correspondence theory and identity theory of truth. Wittgenstein, Russell and Frege are all wavering between the two. Through the analysis and evaluation of relevant theories, we achieve a kind of correspondence theory of truth that includes identity theory of truth, namely “double isomorphic correspondence theory”. On this basis, by distinguishing the inductive truthmaker and deductive truthbearer, a new truthmaker theory, namely the inductive-corresponded truthmaker theory, is proposed. Key Words: Truthmaker theory; Correspondence theory of truth; Identity theory of truth; State of affairs; Fact
Author:
CHEN Xiaoping
SHUANG Xiuhai
Issue:Volume 48, lssue 2, February 2026
Page: 28-36
JOURNAL OF DIALECTICS OF NATURE
About the Journal
Submit
Author Guidelines
Purchase Information
Help
Contact Us
Address: No.19A Yuquan Road, Beijing, 100049, China
Phone: +86-10-88256007
Email:
jdn@ucas.ac.cn
Follow Us
© 2014 Copyright of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
© 2014 Copyright of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences